India’s Goods and Services Tax (GST) has entered a new phase. In early September 2025 the GST Council approved a major rationalisation of rates — frequently called “GST 2.0” — replacing the earlier multi-slab setup with a simpler structure that takes effect from 22 September 2025. The overhaul is aimed at making everyday goods cheaper, easing compliance and nudging household spending — especially important ahead of the festive and wedding seasons.
This article explains the concrete differences between GST 1.0 and GST 2.0, summarises who stands to gain or lose, and describes why this change could shape consumption patterns across India for years to come — using official and reputable reporting as the basis for every key claim.
What GST 1.0 looked like (a quick recap)
When GST was rolled out on 1 July 2017, it replaced a patchwork of central and state indirect taxes and ushered in the principle of “one nation, one tax.” The initial GST architecture used multiple tax slabs (commonly 0%, 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% for most items, with special rates and cesses on some goods), plus separate treatment for items like petroleum and alcohol. The system reduced tax cascading and created a single IT platform for filings, but over time critics said the slab complexity kept prices and compliance harder to manage.
What GST 2.0 changes — the new rate map
The GST Council’s 2025 decision simplifies the general rate structure into two broad slabs: 5% (merit/common-use items) and 18% (standard rate for most other items), with a higher 40% rate reserved for “super-luxury” and sin goods (such as certain tobacco and very high-end items). In addition, the government has announced specific exemptions (for example, individual life and health insurance premiums) and the rollback or consolidation of many item-specific rates. These changes take legal effect from September 22, 2025.
The Union government’s public information note and the Finance Ministry brief describe this set of measures as a deliberate simplification — moving away from four commonly used slabs to two broad categories while using the 40% band to tax demerit and luxury goods. The official release frames it as a step to increase affordability and boost demand.
Key concrete differences (side-by-side)
- Number of common slabs: GST 1.0: multiple (5%, 12%, 18%, 28% commonly in use). GST 2.0: two main slabs (5% and 18%) plus a 40% demerit/luxury rate.
- Who gets relief: Many everyday consumer items previously taxed at higher rates (for example, some personal-care goods, small appliances and low-priced apparel) move into the lower 5% slab.
- Who pays more: Some premium goods which earlier fell under 28% may now sit at 18%, but selected high-end and sin items face the 40% slab to preserve progressivity and discourage harmful consumption.
Why the government acted: inflation, growth and the festive season
Policymakers have emphasised the dual goals of supporting household affordability and stimulating domestic demand amid external headwinds (including higher tariffs and global uncertainty). The timing — effective just before Navratri and Diwali — signals an intent to boost festive sales and revive discretionary spending. Finance Ministry messaging and Union leaders presented the reform as a people-facing measure to make many common purchases cheaper.
Independent agencies and rating firms have also judged this to be a fiscal-policy lever: lowering effective tax rates on hundreds of items is likely to raise real incomes and encourage spending, even as it reduces the tax take in the short term.
The fiscal trade-off: revenue loss vs consumption gain
The government has estimated a net revenue foregone of about ₹48,000 crore (around $5.4 billion) on an annualised basis from the rate rationalisation, with the expectation that stronger demand and better compliance will offset some losses over time. Analysts and agencies disagree on the size and persistence of that loss: some banks and commentators put different figures, while rating agency Moody’s warns the revenue loss could be larger than official estimates, noting it will weigh on near-term government revenues even as it supports consumption. Readers should treat the government estimate as the official baseline and Moody’s and market reports as expert perspectives on upside risks to the fiscal cost.
Who benefits and who may face new costs
Likely beneficiaries
- Households buying everyday goods (personal care, basic apparel, some food-adjacent items) — lower GST should cut prices at the point of sale.
- Price-sensitive segments and lower-to-middle income consumers — they spend a larger share of income on items that fall into the lower slab.
- Some consumer goods and auto makers (small cars and certain appliances saw effective tax reductions), which have already announced price cuts to pass on savings.
Potential losers or affected parties
- Premium brands whose products move to different slabs may see margin pressure or the need to reposition pricing.
- State governments temporarily face lower share of GST receipts; the union and states have mechanisms and compensations to manage transitions, but fiscal planning will be required.
What readers should watch next (verifiable, factual signals)
- Implementation details and item-wise lists published by the GST Council and Finance Ministry — these spell out exactly which items move between slabs. (Official releases and the PIB factsheet are the primary authority.)
- State budget and finance department reactions — how states adjust their spending or use compensation mechanisms.
- Industry price announcements — carmakers and FMCG firms often announce model- or SKU-wise price changes; these show whether tax benefits are being passed to consumers.
- Independent fiscal estimates from rating agencies and banks that track the real fiscal cost and consumption response (for example, Moody’s reports, SBI/Kotak analyses).
Bottom line (evergreen takeaways)
GST 2.0 is a deliberate simplification of India’s indirect tax architecture, with clear winners among everyday consumers and likely short-term fiscal costs. Its long-term effect on consumption will depend on three verifiable things: (a) how many producers pass savings to customers, (b) whether greater formalisation offsets revenue loss, and (c) whether households convert tax savings into sustained spending rather than short-term purchases. For Indians planning household budgets, festive purchases or small business pricing, the key practical consequence is simple: many commonly used items will become cheaper from 22 September 2025, and sectors such as consumer goods and small cars are likely to see immediate demand shifts.
Sources (selected)
- Press Information Bureau (Government of India) — GST reform factsheet and notifications.
- Reuters reporting on India’s GST rate cuts and implementation date. R
- Indian Express — detailed live updates and item lists from the GST Council meeting.
- Moody’s coverage and Indian financial press reporting on revenue and consumption implications.
- Industry coverage (Times of India, NDTV) for immediate market reactions (auto price changes etc.).
Also read;KP Sharma Oli: Nepal’s Strong Political Voice
Last Updated on: Wednesday, September 10, 2025 3:29 pm by Indian News Journal Team | Published by: Indian News Journal Team on Wednesday, September 10, 2025 3:26 pm | News Categories: Politics
About Us: Indian News Journal covers the latest News on Current News, Business, Sports, Tech, Entertainment, Lifestyle, Automobiles, and more, led by Editor-in-Chief Ankur Srivastava. Stay connected on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X (formerly Twitter), Google News, and Whatsapp Channel.
Disclaimer: At Indian News Journal, we are committed to providing accurate, reliable, and thoroughly verified information, sourced from trusted media outlets. For more details, please visit our About, Disclaimer, Terms & Conditions, and Privacy Policy. If you have any questions, feedback, or concerns, feel free to contact us through email.
Contact Us: indianewsjournal160@gmail.com
About The Author
Leave a Reply